-- extracted from rfc3877.txt -- at Sat Sep 18 06:23:14 2004 IANA-ITU-ALARM-TC-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN IMPORTS MODULE-IDENTITY, mib-2 FROM SNMPv2-SMI -- [RFC2578] TEXTUAL-CONVENTION FROM SNMPv2-TC; -- [RFC2579] ianaItuAlarmNumbers MODULE-IDENTITY LAST-UPDATED "200409090000Z" -- September 09, 2004 ORGANIZATION "IANA" CONTACT-INFO "Postal: Internet Assigned Numbers Authority Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330 Marina del Rey, CA 90292-6601 USA Tel: +1 310-823-9358 E-Mail: iana@iana.org" DESCRIPTION "The MIB module defines the ITU Alarm textual convention for objects expected to require regular extension. Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). The initial version of this MIB module was published in RFC 3877. For full legal notices see the RFC itself. Supplementary information may be available on: http://www.ietf.org/copyrights/ianamib.html" REVISION "200409090000Z" -- September 09, 2004 DESCRIPTION "Initial version, published as RFC 3877." ::= { mib-2 119 } IANAItuProbableCause ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION STATUS current DESCRIPTION "ITU-T probable cause values. Duplicate values defined in X.733 are appended with X733 to ensure syntactic uniqueness. Probable cause value 0 is reserved for special purposes. The Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) is responsible for the assignment of the enumerations in this TC. IANAItuProbableCause value of 0 is reserved for special purposes and MUST NOT be assigned. Values of IANAItuProbableCause in the range 1 to 1023 are reserved for causes that correspond to ITU-T probable cause. All other requests for new causes will be handled on a first-come, first served basis and will be assigned enumeration values starting with 1025. Request should come in the form of well-formed SMI [RFC2578] for enumeration names that are unique and sufficiently descriptive. While some effort will be taken to ensure that new probable causes do not conceptually duplicate existing probable causes it is acknowledged that the existence of conceptual duplicates in the starting probable cause list is an known industry reality. To aid IANA in the administration of probable cause names and values, the OPS Area Director will appoint one or more experts to help review requests. See http://www.iana.org" REFERENCE "ITU Recommendation M.3100, 'Generic Network Information Model', 1995 ITU Recommendation X.733, 'Information Technology - Open Systems Interconnection - System Management: Alarm Reporting Function', 1992 ITU Recommendation X.736, 'Information Technology - Open Systems Interconnection - System Management: Security Alarm Reporting Function', 1992" SYNTAX INTEGER { -- The following probable causes were defined in M.3100 aIS (1), callSetUpFailure (2), degradedSignal (3), farEndReceiverFailure (4), framingError (5), lossOfFrame (6), lossOfPointer (7), lossOfSignal (8), payloadTypeMismatch (9), transmissionError (10), remoteAlarmInterface (11), excessiveBER (12), pathTraceMismatch (13), unavailable (14), signalLabelMismatch (15), lossOfMultiFrame (16), receiveFailure (17), transmitFailure (18), modulationFailure (19), demodulationFailure (20), broadcastChannelFailure (21), connectionEstablishmentError (22), invalidMessageReceived (23), localNodeTransmissionError (24), remoteNodeTransmissionError (25), routingFailure (26), --Values 27-50 are reserved for communications alarm related --probable causes -- The following are used with equipment alarm. backplaneFailure (51), dataSetProblem (52), equipmentIdentifierDuplication (53), externalIFDeviceProblem (54), lineCardProblem (55), multiplexerProblem (56), nEIdentifierDuplication (57), powerProblem (58), processorProblem (59), protectionPathFailure (60), receiverFailure (61), replaceableUnitMissing (62), replaceableUnitTypeMismatch (63), synchronizationSourceMismatch (64), terminalProblem (65), timingProblem (66), transmitterFailure (67), trunkCardProblem (68), replaceableUnitProblem (69), realTimeClockFailure (70), --An equipment alarm to be issued if the system detects that the --real time clock has failed antennaFailure (71), batteryChargingFailure (72), diskFailure (73), frequencyHoppingFailure (74), iODeviceError (75), lossOfSynchronisation (76), lossOfRedundancy (77), powerSupplyFailure (78), signalQualityEvaluationFailure (79), tranceiverFailure (80), protectionMechanismFailure (81), protectingResourceFailure (82), -- Values 83-100 are reserved for equipment alarm related probable -- causes -- The following are used with environmental alarm. airCompressorFailure (101), airConditioningFailure (102), airDryerFailure (103), batteryDischarging (104), batteryFailure (105), commercialPowerFailure (106), coolingFanFailure (107), engineFailure (108), fireDetectorFailure (109), fuseFailure (110), generatorFailure (111), lowBatteryThreshold (112), pumpFailure (113), rectifierFailure (114), rectifierHighVoltage (115), rectifierLowFVoltage (116), ventilationsSystemFailure (117), enclosureDoorOpen (118), explosiveGas (119), fire (120), flood (121), highHumidity (122), highTemperature (123), highWind (124), iceBuildUp (125), intrusionDetection (126), lowFuel (127), lowHumidity (128), lowCablePressure (129), lowTemperatue (130), lowWater (131), smoke (132), toxicGas (133), coolingSystemFailure (134), externalEquipmentFailure (135), externalPointFailure (136), -- Values 137-150 are reserved for environmental alarm related -- probable causes -- The following are used with Processing error alarm. storageCapacityProblem (151), memoryMismatch (152), corruptData (153), outOfCPUCycles (154), sfwrEnvironmentProblem (155), sfwrDownloadFailure (156), lossOfRealTimel (157), --A processing error alarm to be issued after the system has --reinitialised. This will indicate --to the management systems that the view they have of the managed --system may no longer --be valid. Usage example: The managed --system issues this alarm after a reinitialization with severity --warning to inform the --management system about the event. No clearing notification will --be sent. applicationSubsystemFailure (158), configurationOrCustomisationError (159), databaseInconsistency (160), fileError (161), outOfMemory (162), softwareError (163), timeoutExpired (164), underlayingResourceUnavailable (165), versionMismatch (166), --Values 168-200 are reserved for processing error alarm related -- probable causes. bandwidthReduced (201), congestion (202), excessiveErrorRate (203), excessiveResponseTime (204), excessiveRetransmissionRate (205), reducedLoggingCapability (206), systemResourcesOverload (207 ), -- The following were defined X.733 adapterError (500), applicationSubsystemFailture (501), bandwidthReducedX733 (502), callEstablishmentError (503), communicationsProtocolError (504), communicationsSubsystemFailure (505), configurationOrCustomizationError (506), congestionX733 (507), coruptData (508), cpuCyclesLimitExceeded (509), dataSetOrModemError (510), degradedSignalX733 (511), dteDceInterfaceError (512), enclosureDoorOpenX733 (513), equipmentMalfunction (514), excessiveVibration (515), fileErrorX733 (516), fireDetected (517), framingErrorX733 (518), heatingVentCoolingSystemProblem (519), humidityUnacceptable (520), inputOutputDeviceError (521), inputDeviceError (522), lanError (523), leakDetected (524), localNodeTransmissionErrorX733 (525), lossOfFrameX733 (526), lossOfSignalX733 (527), materialSupplyExhausted (528), multiplexerProblemX733 (529), outOfMemoryX733 (530), ouputDeviceError (531), performanceDegraded (532), powerProblems (533), pressureUnacceptable (534), processorProblems (535), pumpFailureX733 (536), queueSizeExceeded (537), receiveFailureX733 (538), receiverFailureX733 (539), remoteNodeTransmissionErrorX733 (540), resourceAtOrNearingCapacity (541), responseTimeExecessive (542), retransmissionRateExcessive (543), softwareErrorX733 (544), softwareProgramAbnormallyTerminated (545), softwareProgramError (546), storageCapacityProblemX733 (547), temperatureUnacceptable (548), thresholdCrossed (549), timingProblemX733 (550), toxicLeakDetected (551), transmitFailureX733 (552), transmiterFailure (553), underlyingResourceUnavailable (554), versionMismatchX733 (555), -- The following are defined in X.736 authenticationFailure (600), breachOfConfidentiality (601), cableTamper (602), delayedInformation (603), denialOfService (604), duplicateInformation (605), informationMissing (606), informationModificationDetected (607), informationOutOfSequence (608), keyExpired (609), nonRepudiationFailure (610), outOfHoursActivity (611), outOfService (612), proceduralError (613), unauthorizedAccessAttempt (614), unexpectedInformation (615), other (1024) } IANAItuEventType ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The ITU event Type values. The Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) is responsible for the assignment of the enumerations in this TC. Request should come in the form of well-formed SMI [RFC2578] for enumeration names that are unique and sufficiently descriptive. See http://www.iana.org " REFERENCE "ITU Recommendation X.736, 'Information Technology - Open Systems Interconnection - System Management: Security Alarm Reporting Function', 1992" SYNTAX INTEGER { other (1), communicationsAlarm (2), qualityOfServiceAlarm (3), processingErrorAlarm (4), equipmentAlarm (5), environmentalAlarm (6), integrityViolation (7), operationalViolation (8), physicalViolation (9), securityServiceOrMechanismViolation (10), timeDomainViolation (11) } END -- -- Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). This document is subject -- to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and -- except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. -- -- This document and the information contained herein are provided on an -- "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS -- OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET -- ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, -- INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE -- INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED -- WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. -- -- Intellectual Property -- -- The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any -- Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to -- pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in -- this document or the extent to which any license under such rights -- might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has -- made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information -- on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be -- found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. -- -- Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any -- assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an -- attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of -- such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this -- specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at -- http://www.ietf.org/ipr. -- -- The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any -- copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary -- rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement -- this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf- -- ipr@ietf.org. --