[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why MSDP?

To: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Subject: Re: Why MSDP?
From: Ali Boudani <aboudani@irisa.fr>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 17:28:04 +0200
CC: nagesh.chintada@alcatel.com, ssm-interest@external.cisco.com, pim@catarina.usc.edu, msdp@network-services.uoregon.edu
Organization: INRIA - RENNES
References: <200103222325.RAA13581@windsor.research.att.com>

> One reason: the timescales for change of active source indications are
> much different than BGP was designed to carry.  BGP wants to carry
> data that doesn't change very often, e.g. see route dampening.  Sources
> can come and go at an arbitrary rate, so the rate of change of the
> information is potentially much higher.

can you specifie more,
why should the timescales for change active source indications are much
different.???

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why MSDP?
  - From: "Stephen Sprunk" <ssprunk@cisco.com>
- Re: Why MSDP?
  - From: David Meyer <dmm@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Why MSDP?
Next by Date: Re: Why MSDP?
Prev by thread: ADV:NEED MORE WEBSITE TRAFFIC?
Next by thread: Re: Why MSDP?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread