[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ssm] Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: draft-ietf-ssm-arch-01, wg last call deadline 12/9/2002
Pavlin asked me to relay this message to the list for the record.
This message originally bounced.
-Hugh
------- Forwarded Message -------
Message-Id: <200212181828.gBIISE2U090143@possum.icir.org>
To: holbrook@cisco.com
Cc: ssm-interest@external.cisco.com, pavlin@icir.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: draft-ietf-ssm-arch-01, wg last call deadline 12/9/2002
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:28:14 -0800
From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin@icir.org>
> Yikes. I made a typo in the destination address when I responded to
> Pavlin's mail, so this never went out to the list.
I think I already received this email through the list, but I am not
sure.
In any case, I am happy with the changes, so I don't have any other
comments.
Thanks,
Pavlin
>
> -Hugh
>
> ------- Forwarded Message -------
> From: Hugh Holbrook <holbrook@cisco.com>
> To: holbrook@cisco.com
> Cc: ssm-interest@external.cicso.com, pavlin@icir.org,
> holbrook@cisco.com, dthaler@microsoft.com
> Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: draft-ietf-ssm-arch-01, wg last call deadline 12/9/2002
> Reply-To: holbrook@cisco.com
> Message-Id: <20021213202557.677B710B7A7@holbrook-laptop.cisco.com>
> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 15:25:57 -0500 (EST)
>
> Thanks for the detailed comments, Pavlin.
>
> Responses to your non-IPv6 related comments are inline. I'll follow
> up separately with responses to your IPv6 comments.
>
> -Hugh
>
> > ------- Forwarded Message -------
> > Message-Id: <200211210052.gAL0qDoo082003@possum.icir.org>
> > To: holbrook@cisco.com
> > Cc: ssm-interest@cisco.com
> > Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ssm-arch-01, wg last call deadline 12/9/2002
> > Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:52:13 -0800
> > From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin@icir.org>
> >
> > > There is a new revision of the SSM architecture draft in the ID
> > > archives:
> > >
> > > draft-ietf-ssm-arch-01.txt
> > >
> > > Please consider this email as notice of an SSM working group last call
> > > for comments on this document. Send comments by 12/9/2002.
> >
> > Several comments (in no particular order):
> >
> > * You may want to check the I-D against the nits in
> > http://www.ietf.org/ID-nits.html
> > E.g, don't use citations in the Abstract.
>
> Thanks. I did that. In addition to the citations that you pointed
> out, I added Copyright and IPR sections and changed the example IPv4
> addresses to conform to rfc3330 (use 192.0.2.*)
>
> > * Should the draft include a recommendation that if a host is
> > updated to support SSM, then ASM (*,G) join request by an
> > application for a multicast group that fails within the SSM range
> > should return an error?
>
> I think this is a good suggestion. Brian and I also discussed
> something like this in the context of the IGMPv3/MLDv2 draft. When we
> originally wrote the -arch draft, it was not clear how a host would
> really know the SSM address range (other than by configuration). Now,
> there is the (proposed) MRD option for the SSM range advertisement,
> and we've put in text about possible manual configuration also. So I
> think it would make sense to specify this.
>
> How about adding the following text to the second to last paragraph of
> 4.1 (the one that mentions the MSFAPI) as follows:
>
> When a host has been configured to know the SSM address range, either
> manually or using a protocol, then the host's operating system SHOULD
> return an error to an application that makes a non-source-specific
> request to receive data sent to an SSM destination address.
>
> I'm interested in hearing opinions on this from the list.
>
> > * After enumerating the benefits of the SSM model in Section 1,
> > what about enumerating its limitations/drawbacks? :)
>
> Fair enough. I'll come up with something.
>
> > * Reference [IANA-ALLOCATION] should point to
> > http://www.iana.org/assignments/multicast-addresses
>
> Done.
>
> > * Use consistent notation for the IPv6 hex addresses. E.g., the
> > draft has addresses like FF3x::7fff:ffff which mixes capital with
> > small letters.
>
> Done
>
> > Thanks,
> > Pavlin
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Ssm mailing list
Ssm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ssm