[ssm] Detail about draft-ietf-pim-sm-v2-new-07.txt

[Xavier Brouckaert <xbr@info.ucl.ac.be>]

Hi,

A small detail about the latest PIM-SM draft :
In section 4.1.4 called "(S,G) State", a mention of the
UpstreamSGState(S,G) that should be maintained in the "*Not* interface
specific" subsection is missing.

(There is a mention of the DownstreamJPState(S,G,I) in the "Interface
specific" subsection renamed "PIM (S,G) Join/Prune state")

Is this true or am I wrong ?
I just wanted to be sure to fully understand the draft,

Xavier Brouckaert


_______________________________________________
ssm mailing list
ssm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ssm