[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ssm] A



Tim Chown a =E9crit :

>On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 09:28:06AM -0500, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> =20
>
>>As far as I know, the users of SSM are a set of measure zero.
>>
>>   =20
>>
That's quite logical : SSM is 5 years old (counting from the first 1999=20
Express SIGCOMM paper) compared with ASM which is almost 20 years old=20
(counting from the first SIGCOMM
host group model definition from Deering in 1985). But SSM could grow=20
faster, as it rely on the same routing routing architecture than ASM ;)

For information, at the time of writing, linux is the only operating=20
system supporting IPv4/IPv6 SSM
natively (first patch starting from 21 may 2003 are now included in the=20
main kernel).

Hoerdt Micka=EBl

>>However, from time to time there are tests.
>>
>>Compare
>>http://netflow.internet2.edu/weekly/longit/ssm-octets.png
>>with=20
>>http://netflow.internet2.edu/weekly/longit/multicast-octets.png
>>
>>Pay attention to the scales on the Y axes.
>>
>>I would love to hear of assertions that disprove the above.
>>   =20
>>
>
>We're using IPv6 SSM, as are a number of academic sites in Europe, curre=
ntly
>with the Mad-Flute reliable multicast file transfer protocol, but also
>for some streaming.
>
>This is not commercial, but we have commercial interest in pilots.
>
>Tim
>
>_______________________________________________
>ssm mailing list
>ssm@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ssm
> =20
>


_______________________________________________
ssm mailing list
ssm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ssm