Re: [ssm] Re: draft-chesterfield-avt-rtcpssm

[Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>]

On 4 Jul 2005, at 23:01, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 09:39:32PM +0100, Colin Perkins wrote:
>> On 4 Jul 2005, at 21:09, Toerless Eckert wrote:
>>> What happened to subject draft ? We really need that type of RTCP
>>> for SSM feedback to get some standardization and move on on SSM ?  
>>> Is it
>>> just timed out and nobody cares ? How can it be revived ?
>>
>> The latest version was draft-ietf-avt-rtcpssm-08.txt, which expired
>> recently. I'm hoping a revised draft will be available in time for
>> the next meeting - there has been some discussion on the draft in the
>> last few days.
>
> Just as a general critique: I don't think that a draft like
> draft-ietf-avt-rtcp-feedback should go forward without specifically
> detailing whether or how it supports ASM and/or SSM multicast. This  
> draft
> only refers to multicast, and that is just not sufficient anymore.

The draft is titled "RTCP Extensions for Single-Source Multicast  
Sessions with Unicast Feedback", and makes an explicit distinction  
between ASM and SSM throughout. I'm not sure exactly what else you  
think it should say?

Colin

_______________________________________________
ssm mailing list
ssm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ssm