[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why MSDP?

To: ssprunk@cisco.com
Subject: Re: Why MSDP?
From: Dino Farinacci <dino@procket.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 14:14:53 -0700
CC: aboudani@irisa.fr, dmm@cisco.com, fenner@research.att.com, nagesh.chintada@alcatel.com, ssm-interest@external.cisco.com, pim@catarina.usc.edu, msdp@network-services.uoregon.edu, rcoltun@redback.com, ahuja@umich.edu
In-reply-to: <019901c0be0e$c9dbaad0$33132ca1@glock> (ssprunk@cisco.com)
References: <200104051555.IAA15954@cisco.com> <3ACCA6D6.17122283@irisa.fr> <019901c0be0e$c9dbaad0$33132ca1@glock>

>> Think of the split between PIM and MSDP as similar to the split between
>> ISIS/OSPF/EIGRP/RIP and BGP -- we use different protocols within and
>> between routing domains.

    I wouldn't go that far.

Dino

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why MSDP?
  - From: Bill Nickless <nickless@mcs.anl.gov>

References:
- Re: Why MSDP?
  - From: David Meyer <dmm@cisco.com>
- Re: Why MSDP?
  - From: Ali Boudani <aboudani@irisa.fr>
- Re: Why MSDP?
  - From: "Stephen Sprunk" <ssprunk@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Why MSDP?
Next by Date: Re: Why MSDP?
Prev by thread: Re: Why MSDP?
Next by thread: Re: Why MSDP?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread