[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why MSDP?
- To: Dino Farinacci <dino@procket.com>
- Subject: Re: Why MSDP?
- From: Bill Nickless <nickless@mcs.anl.gov>
- Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 18:19:26 -0500
- Cc: ssprunk@cisco.com, aboudani@irisa.fr, dmm@cisco.com, fenner@research.att.com, nagesh.chintada@alcatel.com, ssm-interest@external.cisco.com, pim@catarina.usc.edu, msdp@network-services.uoregon.edu, rcoltun@redback.com, ahuja@umich.edu
- In-Reply-To: <200104052114.OAA02323@dino-pc.procket.com>
- References: <019901c0be0e$c9dbaad0$33132ca1@glock><200104051555.IAA15954@cisco.com><3ACCA6D6.17122283@irisa.fr><019901c0be0e$c9dbaad0$33132ca1@glock>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 02:14 PM 4/5/2001 -0700, Dino Farinacci wrote:
> >> Think of the split between PIM and MSDP as similar to the split between
> >> ISIS/OSPF/EIGRP/RIP and BGP -- we use different protocols within and
> >> between routing domains.
>
> I wouldn't go that far.
>
>Dino
Making sure I understand you here: MSDP is PIM-specific?
===
Bill Nickless http://www.mcs.anl.gov/people/nickless +1 630 252 7390
PGP:0E 0F 16 80 C5 B1 69 52 E1 44 1A A5 0E 1B 74 F7 nickless@mcs.anl.gov
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQCVAwUBOsz9fqwgm7ipJDXBAQFBhwQAhl0FlwZhhXnvhQtGWVfBWlKIU+ZpAXDF
3LsV3euohtrJPH1WZf78bF550WxgiHoxHxvWFsSZ25qczNqw/m63LcO81yN4r0qq
3nLx03TdWVKzGlF61FqDYdjDsbe9wDk/XjFu9nyW3+57xVfxe193z0e0bp97k51l
pOb9NDqmefg=
=fwar
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----