[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Address allocation

To: tme@21rst-century.com
Subject: Re: Address allocation
From: Ali Boudani <aboudani@irisa.fr>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 15:37:24 +0200
CC: ssm-interest@external.cisco.com
Organization: INRIA - RENNES
References: <3ADED2B1.D226E5ED@irisa.fr> <3ADEE3D0.FFB3D963@21rst-century.com>

Ok,
then what is the meaning of S,G ??
the S, G is not useful also and we should use only S.
I should be interrested just about S and I dont care about G ..
The channel cant mean S,G because S cant generate more than one G , isnt
right??
Thanx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Address allocation
  - From: Steve Simlo <ssimlo@cisco.com>
- Re: Address allocation
  - From: Gregory Shepherd <shep@juniper.net>

References:
- Address allocation
  - From: Ali Boudani <aboudani@irisa.fr>
- Re: Address allocation
  - From: Marshall Eubanks <tme@21rst-century.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Address allocation
Next by Date: Re: Address allocation
Prev by thread: Re: Address allocation
Next by thread: Re: Address allocation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread