[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Address allocation

To: Ali Boudani <aboudani@irisa.fr>, tme@21rst-century.com
Subject: Re: Address allocation
From: Steve Simlo <ssimlo@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 17:34:20 +0100
Cc: ssm-interest@external.cisco.com
In-Reply-To: <3ADEEA14.FF202EA7@irisa.fr>
References: <3ADED2B1.D226E5ED@irisa.fr><3ADEE3D0.FFB3D963@21rst-century.com>

A Source can generate many IPmc discrete groups Gi and each will be a 
separate SSM Channel:

(S,G1), (S,G2)....etc etc

At 15:37 19/04/2001 +0200, Ali Boudani wrote:
>Ok,
>then what is the meaning of S,G ??
>the S, G is not useful also and we should use only S.
>I should be interrested just about S and I dont care about G ..
>The channel cant mean S,G because S cant generate more than one G , isnt
>right??
>Thanx


Steve Simlo
Consulting Engineer
Cisco Systems Ltd
3 The Square
Stockley Park
Uxbridge
Middlesex UB11 1BN
United Kingdom

Direct Line: 		+44 20-8756 8435
Fax:			+44-20-8756 8099
GSM:    		+44 7802-608 318
Home Office Tel: 	+44 20-8767 5886

Email: 	ssimlo@cisco.com
Internal 
URL: 	http://wwwin-emea/FieldInfo/Consult/General/team/PersInfo/ssimlo.htm

References:
- Address allocation
  - From: Ali Boudani <aboudani@irisa.fr>
- Re: Address allocation
  - From: Marshall Eubanks <tme@21rst-century.com>
- Re: Address allocation
  - From: Ali Boudani <aboudani@irisa.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: Address allocation
Next by Date: SSM, RTCP, SAP
Prev by thread: Re: Address allocation
Next by thread: [CORRECTION] 50th IETF Source Specific Multicast WG SLIDES
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread