[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Use of SAP in a PIM SSM Network
ha ha ha
finally people realize
ssm entails _exactly_ as many problems as simple multicast in terms of
1/ deploying it in routers
2/ changing all the applications to use igmpv3
3/ chaing host OS to use igmpv3
4/ changing session management/annoucement mechanisms
:-)
(no i dont want to revisit SM - ssm is just fine, and ipv6 with some
simple kinks will do many-source multicast just fine too)
so no, we dont have resources to do this, but we are happy to roll in
SSM/igmpv3 changes to the mbone apps if people contrib. them (spritn
have kindly offered to do some apps) - sdr is a non trivial one in
that it needs completely re-writing which is outside the scope of a
university research department's normal activities....
In message <3A1265F8.2276000A@alcatel.be>, Dirk Ooms typed:
>>
>>
>>Jon Crowcroft wrote:
>>>
>>> In message <200011142316.PAA29744@cisco.com>, Toerless Eckert typed:
>>>
>>> >>> I am trying to understand in a pure SSM network without any shared tree,
>>> >>> how would SAP operate? My understanding is that SAP is transmitting on a
>>> >>> shared tree. Does it mean that we always stuck with a PIM-SM shared
>>> >>> tree, even in a pure SSM network?
>>>
>>> >>I think you have a network without a shared tree and without SAP. You can
>>> >>of course use SSM to get SAP information, but the receivers need to know
>>> >>the address of the sources in the first place, which is a bit beyond the
>>> >>point of what SAP was meant for in the first place. SAP is nice to have
>>> >>in limited environments, but simply trying to broadcast directory information
>>> >>on a world-wide scale is not a scaling solution. Already today lots of
>>> >>SDP sessions are just made available via the web instead of SAP.
>>>
>>> Toerless
>>>
>>> either you have a well known ssm mcast addr per sap server
>>
>>but the 'sap listener' application requires some changes, it has to join
>>a specific sap server (which again needs to be listed on a webpage?).
>>anyone working on sdr for ssm-only networks?
>>
>>dirk
cheers
jon