[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why MSDP?

To: John Meylor <jmeylor@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Why MSDP?
From: Vijay Gill <vijay@umbc.edu>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:19:55 -0500
cc: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>, <nagesh.chintada@alcatel.com>, <ssm-interest@external.cisco.com>, <pim@catarina.usc.edu>, <msdp@network-services.uoregon.edu>
In-Reply-To: <3ABAD8BC.789E27CD@cisco.com>

On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, John Meylor wrote:

> > So churn wasn't ok for BGP, but its ok in MSDP? Just wondering.
>
> Vijay, yes,

 [snip]

> for PIM/MSDP which could help make sure we can avoid
> unwanted contributions to churn in msdp topology, see
> Marshall Eubanks talk.

John, thanks for the very useful explanation. The question was asked half
in jest, without expecting any serious answers, but the answer is
appreciated nevertheless.

Anyway, jhall and I still owe you a pizza, let us know when and where.

/vijay

References:
- Re: Why MSDP?
  - From: John Meylor <jmeylor@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Auto-tunnel Rant
Next by Date: Re: Why MSDP?
Prev by thread: Re: Why MSDP?
Next by thread: Re: Why MSDP?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread