[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why MSDP?
How about <dah, dah> MMP -- (M)SDP/(M)BPG/(P)IM.
^ On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 05:04:56PM -0800, Dino Farinacci wrote:
^ > But I'm in favor of keeping acroynms as simple as possible, so I would
^ > suggest:
^ >
^ > SSM - single source multicast (because changing this will really
^ > confuse people - again)
^
^ Well, i thought we'd already called this "Source Specific Multicast" for qui
te
^ a while. At least in all the specs in the SSM working group.
^
^ And if you have that meaning of SSM, then ASM makes a very good distinction:
^ In SSM you the receiver must be SPECIFIC about which source you want traffic
^ from (and right, it can be more than one), and in ASM you take traffic from
^ ANY source.
^
^ > OM - original multicast
^
^ Oh no, yet another abbreviation ;-))
^
^ Cheers
^ Toerless
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Zwiebel Phone: 408-526-5303
Cisco Systems Inc.
IP Multicast Group